31 January 2013

Skandies: #17

Picture: Neighboring Sounds (51/4)
Director: Hong Sang-soo, The Day He Arrives (51/4)
Actress: Isabelle Huppert, In Another Country (56/6)
Actor: Jamie Foxx, Django Unchained (57/6)
S. Actor: Sam Rockwell, Seven Psychopaths (66/5)
S. Actress: Sarah Silverman, Take This Waltz (50/5)
Screenplay: Hong Sang-soo, The Day He Arrives (69/7)
Scene: Mile 3.25 Tidal Inlet, Moonrise Kingdom (53/5)

sk17 from Daniel Gemko on Vimeo.

[I made an executive decision to treat this entire sequence as one scene, though some people voted for specific parts of it (mostly the dance). It's not quite a montage in the traditional sense, but I feel like it's effectively one idea. Also sync is a fraction of a second off again, not sure why that keeps happening.]

HISTORY:

Hong, most of whose best films have been ineligible for the main survey (and won the Undies), also placed 17th in Director for Woman on the Beach in 2008. As a screenwriter, he's made the cut twice: for Woman on the Beach (#11, 2008) and Night and Day (#13, 2009).

Isabelle Huppert now ties Tilda Swinton as the second-most-honored actor in Skandies history, with 10 total appearances. (Philip Seymour Hoffman leads with 13, any possible appearances this year not included.) The roll call:

2. The Piano Teacher
2s. 8 Women
4. Gabrielle
8. The School of Flesh
12. White Material
13s. I [Heart] Huckabees
15. La Cérémonie
17. Time of the Wolf
17. In Another Country
19. Home

Foxx gets his third nod, having previously placed 10th and 12th in 2004 for Ray and Collateral, respectively. Rockwell scores his fourth, following appearances in the lead category at #13 (Confessions of a Dangerous Mind, 2002), #4 (Joshua, 2007), and #11 (Moon, 2009). Silverman is new. (Also, Salma Hayek actually tied with her for #17, I belatedly noticed.)

30 January 2013

Skandies: #18

Picture: Bernie (50/5)
Director: Steven Soderbergh, Haywire (42/8)
Actress: Leslie Mann, This Is 40 (53/7)
Actor: Gael García Bernal, The Loneliest Planet (56/9)
S. Actor: Christopher Walken, Seven Psychopaths (63/8)
S. Actress: Salma Hayek, Savages (50/5) [tie for #17]
Screenplay: Jean-Pierre & Luc Dardenne, The Kid With a Bike (68/8)
Scene: Fried chicken penance, Killer Joe (49/6)

[NOTE: I just grabbed a crappy version from YouTube, because creating my own video would have required watching the scene again and I have zero desire to do that. Nor do I recommend that anyone who hasn't seen Killer Joe subject themselves to this noxiousness. And I cordially invite everyone who voted for it to go fuck themselves. What is wrong with you people. And I say that as a staunch defender of the rape scene in Irreversible, which at least has a goddamn purpose beyond cheap provocation. This is just repugnant.]

HISTORY:

Soderbergh makes his seventh overall and second consecutive appearance. He previously won for Out of Sight (1998) and placed 11th for The Limey (1999), 2nd for Traffic (2000), 15th for Erin Brockovich (also 2000), 20th for Ocean's Eleven (2001), and 16th last year for Contagion. Interestingly, no fewer than five (5) of the films for which Soderbergh has placed in Director failed to make the cut in Picture. [SPOLIER!]

Mann made her only previous appearance playing the exact same character in Knocked Up (2007), for which she placed 11th in Supporting. García Bernal landed at #15 in 2002 for Y tu mamá también and at #19 in 2004 for Bad Education. (You'll make it out of the teens one day, Gael!) Walken gets his first nod in a decade, having previously placed only for Catch Me if You Can (#8s, 2002). Hayek, despite her lengthy career, is new.

As writers, the Dardennes previously placed 12th for La Promesse (1997), 16th for The Son (2003), 17th for L'Enfant (The Child) (2006), and 10th for Lorna's Silence (2009). So this finish is par for their course.

29 January 2013

Skandies: #19

Picture: Lincoln (48/6)
Director: Ang Lee, Life of Pi (41/4)
Actress: Chiara Mastroianni, Beloved (48/3)
Actor: Channing Tatum, Magic Mike (53/6)
S. Actor: Bidzina Gujabidze, The Loneliest Planet (61/6)
S. Actress: Frances McDormand, Promised Land (49/5)
Screenplay: Skip Hollandsworth and Richard Linklater, Bernie (64/9)
Scene: "Ladies of Tampa," Magic Mike (48/3)

sk19 from Daniel Gemko on Vimeo.

[Sync is slightly off, sorry. Also, I let the scene continue into Dallas' subsequent routine to a different song, because if people were really just voting for his rendition of "Ladies of Tampa" then I don't know what.]

HISTORY:

Ang Lee is a previous Skandie winner for Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (2000). He also placed 12th in 1997 for The Ice Storm and 6th in 2005 for Brokeback Mountain.

Of the actors, only McDormand has previously placed. This is her sixth appearance (and third non-Coen nod), with all but Fargo (#3, 1996) in Supporting. The others: Almost Famous (#4s, 2000), Wonder Boys (#17s, 2000), The Man Who Wasn't There (#8s, 2001), and Burn After Reading (#17s, 2008).

Skip Hollandsworth has no previous feature film credits, but Linklater previously placed 2nd in 2004 for co-writing Before Sunset and 9th in 2006 for his adaptation of A Scanner Darkly.

28 January 2013

Skandies: #20

[For those of you new to the Skandies, below is what placed 20th in each of these categories. Tomorrow all the #19s will be unveiled, then #18 the next day, etc. If you just want to know who won, check back here in 20 days.]

Picture: Elena (46/5)
Director: Richard Linklater, Bernie (40/3)
Actress: Linda Cardellini, Return (45/4)
Actor: Jared Gilman, Moonrise Kingdom (45/7)
S. Actor: Jason Clarke, Zero Dark Thirty (55/7)
S. Actress: Maeve Jinkings, Neighboring Sounds (47/4)
Screenplay: Martin McDonagh, Seven Psychopaths (51/5)
Scene: An angel serves tea, Once Upon a Time in Anatolia (46/5)

sk20 from Daniel Gemko on Vimeo.

[NOTE: I opted not to go to the trouble of creating subtitles for the few words of dialogue, as they're inexplicable out of context anyway. For the record, the fourth dude to receive tea asks the fifth "Aren't you dead?" (he is; he's not really there), and then is just brusquely told "Hey, let's go, I'm not finished with you" by the heavyset man. Doesn't much matter as I'm pretty sure the folks who voted for this scene were more struck by its formal aspects than its content.]

HISTORY: Linklater previously placed 18th for Waking Life (2001), 13th for The School of Rock (2003), 4th for Before Sunset (2004), and 19th for A Scanner Darkly (2006).

All four actors are new. (Is Jinkings the washing-machine humper?)

McDonagh fared significantly better—5th—in 2008 for In Bruges.

23 January 2013

Skandies: Best undistributed films, 2010

(For those unfamiliar with the Skandies, my annual survey o' cinema, now in its (gack) 18th year, you can find the procedural-historical lowdown here and results from previous years over yonder.)

Here, then, are the group's estimation of the best films that premiered during 2010 but failed to secure New York distribution (and hence eligibility for the Skandies proper, which has a two-year window) by the end of 2012. I used to unveil these simultaneously with the main top 20, but it occurred to me a few years back that they really ought to have their own separate platform, given their undeserved semi-obscurity. (However, they're butting right up against the main survey this year, because I happened to suffer a week-long kidney stone attack just as I was planning to assemble this post. Then got caught up in holiday/year-end madness.)

As it happens, fewer and fewer notable films—where "notable" is defined as "made some noise on the fest circuit and were likely to be seen by several voters"—are failing to secure a week-long NYC run. This year we finally hit what I consider a tipping point: Five people who usually vote in this section (out of a pool of only 17) chose to abstain, saying they just hadn't seen enough eligible titles. As a result, a number of films would have cracked the top 20 on the basis of a single vote. So I've whittled the list down to just a top 10. It's a good thing, really—in a perfect world, there'd be no need for this category, and we're getting remarkably close.

As ever, disclaimers abound. While roughly 40 professional and amateur cinéastes vote in the main survey, a smaller subset takes part in what's become known as the Undies—basically the folks who make it out to multiple festivals. (You can find their names way at the bottom.) And of course circumstances dictate that the results will skew in favor of those undistributed films that have been most widely seen, with a particular advantage going to anything that played at Toronto. No doubt many other excellent films were simply not seen by enough people to make the cut; feel free to mention overlooked favorites in the comments.

Alas, I'm too harried at the moment to write up commentary on 10 films, many of which I haven't seen. So I've let various folks who've posted their thoughts on the IMDb provide a characteristic remark.

In reverse chrono:

#10 Surviving Life (Theory and Practice) (Jan Svankmajer) 37 pts | 2 votes

"Svankmajer seems to have a grumpy side and what is his problem with beauty...so many of the characters in his films are ugly! Alice was more pleasant in that despite the grotesqueness of all the other characters in the film, the protagonist was pretty. I know, it's not what his work is supposed to be about, but hey...all the same!"



#9 In the Shadows (Thomas Arslan) 38 pts | 3 votes

"An effective, propulsive score describes a life of constant motion, and photography of fluorescent interiors (shot with a Red camera) perfectly captures a world where night always reigns."



#8 Curling (Denis Côté) 38 pts | 4 votes

"My gripes with Curling are slim to none, but that's not to say I really enjoyed it. It's a strange film that possesses a strength which rewards the inquisitive thinker. Just a heads up: Be careful to whom you recommend this; even though the film has a similar tone to other bizarre flicks (like Dogtooth, for instance), I would say it's even less accessible. If you don't like films that urge you to clue things together, then I'd say go ahead and skip this."



#7 Brownian Movement (Nanouk Leopold) 47 pts | 4 votes

"I had no idea what this movie would be about. But it played at the Berlin International Film Festival this year and the title sounded intriguing. Plus it did fit into my schedule. It really goes all the way and is pretty harsh and raw. While you never really get into the head of our main actress, she seems to bear it all [sic?]. So this isn't for the delicate viewers amongst us."



#6 I Wish I Knew (Jia Zhang-ke) 48 pts | 6 votes

"Unfortunately, this film in no way gives a person watching it the impression that Shanghai is one of the most powerful cities in the world. There was scarcely a mention of Japanese occupation. Instead, we are subjected to no less than eighteen people sitting around and recounting their memories, more of their family lives than of Shanghai itself. For the most part, these people's memories were mundane and tedious. Then there was the young woman wandering around The Bund, or walking in the rain – why? Who knows, as it's never explained? Granted, things don't have to be spelled out in black and white, but for the life of me, I couldn't see the point."



#5 Guest (José Luis Guerín) 49 pts | 4 votes

"The film started well, without any particular intention or purpose, capturing life, in life. But then the filmmaker acquired a purpose, and went looking for certain things, tried to film certain things to the exclusion of others, and lost objectivity (objectivity has nothing to do with whether something is fiction or nonfiction)—which could be seen in how his subjects acted toward him, as if they were performing more and more. There was almost an expression of disbelief on their faces—the cardinal sin in documentary-making."



#4 Black Venus (Abdellatif Kechiche) 50 pts | 4 votes

"As flawed as this movie may have been, at the end of the day it was a step forward in black film (if there even is such a thing). For once I didn't have to sit through a movie about: the first black athlete to slam dunk a basketball at an Ivy League school; a single teen mother in the ghetto (yes I'm taking a stab at Precious and the hundred other movies to focus on that); an aspiring rapping pimp (Hustle & Flow); a black sidekick that has some stupid loyalty to the white main character (a role kept alive by Morgan Freeman and Whoopi Goldberg); or a biography about a predictable civil rights leader."



#3 Promises Written in Water (Vincent Gallo) 74 pts | 4 votes

"Gallo's newest film is extremely radical and complex and its story is told in a subtle manner way outside of the convention of the mainstream. The film's vocabulary is stunningly sophisticated and those who choose to describe the film in standard film-review terms are insulting cinema and insulting themselves. Since Promises Written in Water does not follow a program which is comfortable for lazy mainstream writers, they must lash out against Gallo and they do so most often more personally than in regards to his work. Still Gallo continues to grown creatively and Promises Written in Water reveals the work of an very important high-level filmmaker at the top of his game. The film is simply beautiful. If your lens for watching films is stuck in past references or your expectations are standardized then I suggest you avoid this film. Personally I am grateful that a great filmmaker like Vincent Gallo can still exist in this world." [Please let this be Gallo himself.]



#2 The City Below (Christoph Hochhäusler) 80 pts | 5 votes

"In the end, The City Below is showing us something much more problematic, and much more exciting, than postmodern ennui. We know that men like Roland Cordes exist, and that women like Svenja Steve mindlessly orbit them, and that these people make life difficult, if not unbearable, for the vast majority of us. But these two disintegrating characters eventually drift away from privilege. They are not revolutionaries—they are not focused or even present enough to reflect on their own position—but their position of privilege, their class, is gradually being disarticulated. This mental disarray, the vague but ineluctable knowledge that things are no longer making sense as perhaps they once did, is a vital "task," if we can call something so unconscious a task. It is probably best described as a pressure, and Hochhäusler is showing us, throughout The City Below and in its final minutes, both the 99 percent running roughshod over the old system and the 1 percent morphing into something as yet undetermined." [From an essay by Michael Sicinski published by Moving Image Source. Sad that this terrific film has no user comments at all.]



#1 Hahaha (Hong Sang-soo) 86 pts | 8 votes

"Food is an important element. Food is central to every cultural idiosyncrasy in the world; Korea is not the exception and it is really sensitive how Korean specificities in relation to food are brought to the center of this mosaic. Count the scenes that develop around meals."



Yes, this is the third time Hong has won the Undies in 11 years. This despite having no fewer than three (3) films also eligible for the survey proper in 2012.

THE VOTERS: Mike D'Angelo, Alex Fung, Sky Hirschkron, Don Marks, Victor J. Morton, Theo Panayides, Vadim Rizov, Dan Sallitt, Michael Sicinski, Chris Stults, C. Mason Wells, and Blake Williams. Thanks to all.

For the record, here are the next 10 films, in alphabetical order:

Archipelago (Joanna Hogg)
Bas-fonds (Isild Le Besco)
Belle Epine (Rebecca Zlotowski)
Deep in the Woods (Benoît Jacquot)
Erie (Kevin Jerome Everson)
Essential Killing (Jerzy Skolimowski)
Machete Maidens Unleashed! (Mark Hartley)
On Tour (Mathieu Amalric)
Outbound (Bogdan George Apetri)
Winter Vacation (Li Hongqi)

PREVIOUS WINNERS:

2000: Battle Royale (Kinji Fukasaku)
2001: Pulse (Kiyoshi Kurosawa)*
2002: Turning Gate (Hong Sang-soo)
2003: Not on the Lips (Alain Resnais)
2004: The 10th District Court—Moments of Trial (Raymond Depardon)
2005: Tale of Cinema (Hong Sang-soo)
2006: Taxidermia (György Pálfi)*
2007: Secret Sunshine (Lee Chang-dong)*
2008: Just Anybody (Jacques Doillon)
2009: Face (Tsai Ming-liang)

* (released commercially after the window of eligibility had closed)


03 December 2012

NYFCC Best Picture voting, 2001

Don't know if there's a statute of limitations on this stuff, but since I'm no longer an active member I'm not sure what measures anyone could take. Anyway, 2001 was my first year as a voter, and I was excited enough about the privilege that I went to the goofy trouble of writing down complete voting information, literally everything. And then posted it to a members-only nerd group, where it still resides. So here it is, for those curious about how the sausage is made.




Rather than try to cram all this information into one endless post, I
think I'll go category by category, in the order in which we voted. Those
uninterested in voting minutiae should delete or ignore these articles as
quickly as they arrive on your server (which may not be all that quickly,
as it's kind of tedious work and I have stuff to get done tonight).

HOW THE VOTING WORKS: First ballot, everybody (including proxies) votes
for their top choice only. In order to win, the film or person must
appear on 50%+1 of all ballots cast. Needless to say, this almost never
happens, and it didn't happen once this year. However, those who read a
lot of different NY critics can have fun trying to work out whose vote is
whose.

Second ballot, everybody (includes proxies) votes for their top three (3)
choices in preferential order. First choice gets 3 points, second choice
2, third choice 1. In order to win, the film or person must (a) have the
highest point total *and* (b) appear on 50%+1 of all ballots cast. (I
recall only one instance in which these two criteria were met by two
separate films.)

Third ballot's the same as the second, except the proxies drop out and
everybody's reconfiguring their vote on the basis of which films or
performers are actually in the running. There are provisions for ballots
four and five, but this year we never went past the third.

Deliberation, incidentally, is nonexistent, unless a derisive snort when
a name is read aloud counts as deliberation.

As you'll see, IN THE BEDROOM had about ten diehard supporters -- enough
to give it the lead on ballots one and two -- but picked up virtually no
other adherents on the third ballot, when allegiances abruptly shift.
(For example, I gave up on MEMENTO on ballot three, since it was clearly
dead in the water, and threw my weight behind eventual winner DOCTOR
MULHOLLAND, as much to block the overrated IN THE BEDROOM as to honor
Lynch's excellent work. So much for voting my conscience down the
line...)


1st ballot
---------

In the Bedroom (7)
Mulholland Dr. (5)
Shrek (4)
AI (3)
Gosford Park (2)
In the Mood for Love (2)
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2)
The Man Who Wasn't There (2)
Memento (2)
The Royal Tenenbaums (2)
Black Hawk Down
Ghost World
Kandahar
Monster's Ball
Va Savoir
Waking Life
Werckmeister Harmonies


2nd ballot
---------

In the Bedroom (35/13)
Mulholland Dr. (30/12)
Gosford Park (22/11)
AI (15/8)
Shrek (15/7)
Memento (12/6)
In the Mood for Love (11/7)
The Royal Tenenbaums (9/4)
The Man Who Wasn't There (8/3)
Ghost World (7/5)
Black Hawk Down (7/4)
The Deep End (6/4)
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (6/3)
Waking Life (5/3)
Werckmeister Harmonies (5/2)
Amores Perros (3/2)
The Pledge (3/2)
Kandahar (3/1)
Va Savoir (3/1)
Moulin Rouge (2/2)
The Day I Became a Woman (2/1)
The Devil's Backbone (2/1)
Donnie Darko (2/1)
Monster's Ball (2/1)
Ocean's Eleven (2/1)
The Others (2/1)
Pinero (2/1)
The Tailor of Panama (2/1)
Amelie (1/1)
L.I.E. (1/1)
Together (1/1)


3rd ballot
---------

Mulholland Dr. (46/18)
Gosford Park (39/19)
In the Bedroom (33/12)
The Royal Tenenbaums (12/6)
AI (10/8)
In the Mood for Love (7/4)
Memento (6/4)
Shrek (6/4)
The Man Who Wasn't There (5/3)
Black Hawk Down (4/2)
The Deep End (4/2)
Ghost World (4/2)
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2/2)
Monster's Ball (2/1)
Werckmeister Harmonies (2/1)
Pinero (2/1)
The Pledge (2/1)
Waking Life (2/1)
Amelie (1/1)
Donnie Darko (1/1)
Moulin Rouge (1/1)

md'a

04 August 2012

Viewing Journal: Week of 23-29 Jul

As you may have intuited by now, the future of this journal is uncertain, at least in its current form. Letterboxd offers an ideal format for the semi-casual capsule in which I specialize, and as I noted earlier, it makes it easier for me to vary the length according to how much of interest I actually have to say (whereas in a weekly format I feel anal-retentively obligated to give each film roughly equal space, though I do cut myself some slack on W/Os and films I've previously reviewed). To be honest, I was preparing a farewell speech, but then a stranger kindly sent me $50, so once again I feel compelled to keep going. I guess for now I'll put up the Letterboxd reviews, maybe expanding the really short ones a little if anything more occurs to me. (If you're happy about that you should drop me a few bucks. As you can see, it works.)

  • /Altered States/ (1980, Ken Russell): 52. Very effective as a portrait of heedless curiosity, considerably less so as the love story it apparently intends to be. An audacious choice to devote the first act to semi-passionate courtship and then jump ahead seven years to the point where they're getting divorced, but the downside is that the relationship never really takes hold, which makes Hurt's about-face in the home stretch feel hollow and even somewhat phony. Also, I confess to having serious suspension-of-disbelief issues with the very premise, especially since the movie gets the science so hilariously wrong. The x-ray of Hurt's skull is a particular howler. Gorillas are not our ancestors, fellas.

  • The Night of the Grizzly (1966, Joseph Pevney): 42. Despite 'Scope photography, this forgotten quasi-Western has the clunky, overemphatic feel of '60s TV (exacerbated by the presence of Nancy Kulp—Miss Hathaway on The Beverly Hillbillies—providing excruciating comic "relief"). Misleading title, too—very little of the film takes place at night, and the grizzly is arguably its third-string antagonist. (Just as well, because it's about as terrifying as Fozzie.) Don't think I'd ever seen Clint Walker before; he pretty much begins and ends at "strapping."

  • The Island of Dr. Moreau (1996, John Frankenheimer): 25. Total number of flying fucks given by Val Kilmer in this picture: 0.00000000000. It's actually painful to watch poor David Thewlis struggle to give a coherent performance amidst such random lunacy; no doubt he signed on to work with Brando, but instead he got "Brand-o," the bored old man whose commitment to flipping convention the bird had become its own perverse sort of brand. And while you'd think the one certain advantage this would have over Island of Lost Souls would be makeup and special effects, neither the mutants nor the Sex Kitten Formerly Known As Jungle Cat are remotely as unnerving here as they were in the '33 version, perhaps because they're competing for the grotesquerie crown with most of the human cast. (Admittedly the much-touted homunculus does not disappoint.) Undoubtedly has camp value for some, but it just made me sad.

  • Samurai I: Musashi Miyamoto (1954, Hiroshi Inagaki): 55.
  • Samurai II: Duel at Ichijoji Temple (1955, Hiroshi Inagaki): 46.
  • Samurai III: Duel at Ganryu Island (1956, Hiroshi Inagaki): 38.

    Serious question: Has there ever been a trilogy—bona fide, I mean, not just a film and its two sequels—that isn't widely considered a masterpiece? No matter how mediocre some or even all of the films may be, people just swoon at the sheer triptychyness of the whole affair. (See also: Red Riding, Dreileben, etc.) I came to a somewhat belated understanding with the first installment and its bloated origin story, which starts out sluggish but gets more and more compelling as its ostensible hero is systematically deceived, humiliated and otherwise abused, learning the hard way that with great power comes great responsibility; or that a Jedi uses the Force for knowledge and defense, never for attack; or maybe just chill the fuck out there Slashy. But shouldn't there be a tad more action in a samurai series? Ichijoji Temple features one badass-if-brief duel at the beginning, one man-vs.-army showdown at the end, and a whole lotta deadly soap-opera in between. (Plus it's not even clear to me why Musashi calls out this swordfightin' academy in the first place. Far as I can tell he's just trying to make a name for himself, the way young gunfighters seek out Old West legends; unlike the first film, though, this one doesn't seem to find such behavior juvenile or shameful, which meant I found myself kinda rooting for the ostensible bad guys.) And Ganryu Island does nothing but stall for nearly two hours, as Musashi postpones his inevitable face-off with the effeminate rival (which, again, has no emotional undercurrent whatsoever because it's strictly glory-seeking) in order to go be a humble farmer for a year, which despite the presence of some bandits is about as exciting as it sounds. Sunrise duel, when it finally arrives, is superbly elemental and suggests that Inagaki might have been something had he been a stronger judge of material. But the series honestly needs Harvey Scissorhands to fashion one solid two-hour film from all the largely redundant and/or monotonous footage. All the same, it's arguably worth enduring for the drop-dead gorgeous Eastmancolor alone. Let's see digital rival that.